Weight Loss Maintenance in Primary Care

 

Principal Investigator:  Michael Lowe, Ph.D.

Drexel University

 

Abstract:

 

The rising prevalence of obesity is taking an increasingly severe toll on the nation’s health.  The present proposal is aimed at evaluating two interventions for weight loss maintenance in primary care patients.  The participants (N=280) will be recruited by their physicians and will initially lose weight for 12 weeks using a meal replacement-supplemented diet and the LEARN manual.  At the end of the weight loss period participants will be assigned at random to one of four groups, formed by crossing two factors.  The first factor is the presence or absence of meal replacements (MR+ and MR-) to facilitate weight loss maintenance.  The second factor is the presence or absence of a Reduced Energy Density Eating (REDE+ and REDE-) program.  The four treatment conditions to be tested during the weight loss maintenance period are MR-/REDE-, MR+/REDE-, MR-/REDE+, and MR+/REDE+.  All participants will receive the LEARN manual plus treatment manuals consistent with their weight maintenance condition.  They will be called by an Obesity Specialist regularly throughout the year-long intervention.  The aim of the study is to test the hypothesis that: 1) the MR+/REDE- and MR-/REDE+ groups will maintain their weight losses and related behavioral and nutritional changes better than the LEARN-only (MR-/REDE-) group, and 2) the MR+/REDE+ group will maintain their weight loss and related changes better than the MR-/REDE-, MR+/REDE-, and MR-/REDE+ groups. This study is important because it may identify better ways of promoting long-term improvements in the diet and body weight of obese patients seen in primary care settings. Outcome measures, which will be collected at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, will assess changes in body weight and composition, nutritional composition of the diet, measures of eating control, obesity-related quality of life, physical activity, patient and physician satisfaction ratings, and several medical risk factors (blood pressure, lipids, and HbA1c).


Specific Aims:

 

The rising prevalence of obesity is taking an increasingly severe toll on the nation’s health. Achieving and maintaining a medically significant weight loss is of particular importance for those overweight individuals who have, or who are at greatest risk for developing, one of the many medical conditions associated with obesity. In line with this objective, the present proposal is aimed at producing long-term changes in nutritional intake and body weight in primary care practices where such patients are routinely treated. 

 

Traditional lifestyle change weight control programs produce medically significant weight reductions for most individuals participating in them. However, the weight losses achieved in these programs – and the health improvements that result from them – typically dissipate over time. No satisfactory solution to the long-term weight regain problem has yet been identified.

 

Lifestyle change programs for obesity are primarily based on social learning theory.  In a paper recently published in Obesity Research, we reviewed the assumptions upon which traditional lifestyle change treatments are based, and compared these assumptions to a variety of recent biobehavioral research findings on factors controlling eating and weight regulation. This analysis forms the foundation of the biobehavioral model of eating regulation upon which the present application is based. The major aim of the proposed research is to demonstrate that two nutritionally-focused interventions derived from this biobehavioral model of eating regulation will produce superior long-term maintenance of changes in eating behavior, the nutritional composition of the diet, medical risk factors and weight losses relative to a traditional lifestyle change program (based on the LEARN manual).

 

The first intervention will replace one meal and one snack per day with a meal replacement (MR) to promote weight loss maintenance.  The second intervention will teach participants to reduce the energy density of their diet while preserving its palatability to the greatest extent possible (the Reduced Energy Density Eating or REDE intervention.  These two factors will be crossed, permitting a test of the effects of the presence or absence of MRs (MR+ vs. MR-) and the presence or absence of REDE (REDE+ vs. REDE-) on weight loss maintenance and related outcomes. 

 

Aim 1:  To test the hypothesis that the MR and REDE interventions, when added separately to the LEARN program, will produce superior weight loss maintenance compared to a LEARN-only intervention. 

 

There is also reason to hypothesize that the effects of MRs and REDE should be complementary rather than redundant.  The primary benefit of MRs stems from a reduction in energy intake at the meals or snacks when they are consumed.  The primary benefit of REDE is to produce changes in the overall energy density and nutritional composition of the diet.  Also supporting the possibility of additive effects is the likelihood that some individuals will not adhere consistently to MRs during maintenance.  In such cases, the simultaneous availability of the REDE program will provide an alternative way to control energy intake.  Finally, in the condition where both MRs and REDE are available during maintenance, some participants might use MRs to reverse weight gains and REDE to prevent weight gains (i.e., sustain weight maintenance), another potential type of complementariness.

 

Aim 2:  To test the hypothesis that the a maintenance condition that combines MRs and REDE will produce better maintenance of weight losses than either individual component and than the LEARN-only condition.

 

Aim 3:  To test the hypothesis that the two conditions receiving the REDE intervention will experience longer-lasting improvements in the energy density and nutritional composition of the diet compared to the two non-REDE conditions.

 

Primary care represents an ideal setting for the delivery of weight management programs because physicians are potentially powerful agents of change, are responsible for detecting and treating medical conditions associated with obesity, and see their patients periodically over lengthy periods of time.  Participants will be male and female patients attending one of four primary care practices affiliated with Drexel University College of Medicine. Outcome measures will include body weight and composition, energy density and nutritional composition of the diet, eating control, physical activity, obesity-related qualify of life, and obesity-related health risk factors. These measures will be collected at baseline, and 6, 12, 24 and 36 months following treatment initiation.